ELSA Speak- Online English Learning & Practic-App-review

Now that’s out of my system, here’s a review of ELSA Speak. It’s an app that teaches you to ‘pronounce English like an American through real-world conversations’. It’s a great use of AI in language learning – it really is amazing what some of these apps can do now!

With ELSA Speak you can work through a wide range of activities which mainly focus on the individual sounds of English. Most activities involve recording yourself saying a word or phrase. The phrases are topic related (introductions, family, business, food and drink, etc) so not only can you improve your pronunciation, you can also learn phrases that are relevant to your own context.


You can choose the skill (sounds) you’re interested in. A bulk of the activities involve recording phrases like the one above.

The app models the correct pronunciation then records your attempt. You can listen back to a recording of your voice, and read/listen to instant feedback on your performance.

You can retry as many times as you like. There are some other tasks, e.g. listening tasks for discrimination, plus some of the dialogues are performed as if they’re a real conversation.

The app isn’t just about pronunciation. It has a dictionary too, where it provides definitions, pictures and example sentences (plus a pronunciation model) to explain various words. On the pronunciation side, the dictionary also acts as a phrasebook – you can type in what you want to say and the app will model the correct pronunciation for your phrase:

The app maps your progress, records words and phrases you have difficulty with so you can review them, plus it provides an assessment feature too.

READ ALSO  Left vs Right Brain Games for Brain Training app review

What’s good about it?

Overall the app has great promise. I say promise – on the ELSA Speak site they state that the app has already been used 40 million times, so it’s clearly taken off! I wouldn’t say it’s the finished article yet though.

The instant feedback is the best feature by far. You get tips on the articulation of particular sounds, and you get a chance to put this feedback into practice straight away:

There are a lot of activities that focus on common difficulties such as /l/ versus /r/ and distinguishing between long and short vowels, both of which are useful in my context.

The app is gamified which definitely adds something – especially if you’re a Brit trying to put on an American accent (hehe). The progress record is great, plus in general the app is easy to use, visually pleasing and has been designed intuitively. It’s fairly priced – I’d say there is enough to keep a user focused if you chose a 3 month signup (about $3.50 a month).


What could improve?

There is still quite a lot that could be done to this app.

The ‘native speaker’ thing

Part of the app’s selling point is the progression towards attaining native-speaker like pronunciation. The progress section (see above images) makes this ‘Native Speaker Score’ fairly prominent. It’s awkward that the app is based on one particular model of pronunciation but hey, I suppose you’re opening a can of worms if you broaden the scope to accommodate all acceptable variations of a sound. The developers could look into this though.

READ ALSO  Duolingo - Learn English - App Review

It’s too easy to rig

With most activities you see that the target sounds appear in phrases. It doesn’t take long for lazy people like me to realise that the app is just listening for the target sound, and the phrases are therefore arbitrary. Once you work this out then the tasks become more like practise of isolated sounds. For learners, the desire to understand and use the whole phrase may compensate for this. There should be some way to prevent you just saying the isolated sound – I did find something similar with Duolingo at times when learning Spanish, but that was a few years back.

Lack of focus on connected speech

That whole isolated sounds comment above isn’t true when you do the assessment. This feature gives you some pretty interesting feedback – I’m pleased with my 54% /l/ versus /r/ accuracy!

Looking at the detailed script, it looks like some of the parts I got ‘wrong’ (like in number 8) were probably just contractions. I think the next stage for the developers is to work out how the app can recognise and accommodate features of connected speech. Maybe I’m just bitter that I’m only 91% accurate…


I do love the instant feedback. However, sometimes the description of how to make a sound isn’t enough – a video demo would be better.